THE DISCREPANCY // 091
A June 2017 published account describes checking cat-litter packaging in a shop, finding the singular Tidy Cat, then encountering Tidy Cats again. The writer remembers a modern return, rather than only a childhood disagreement over the name.
⌁
A tiny pawprint hides 1954. This name has a past; identify which bag belongs to your memory.
THE AISLE AS A CHECKPOINT
The reported sequence is Cats → Cat → Cats. The account places the in-store check roughly a month before the later observation. Recall the bag, colour and shop before searching for it again. Which part of the package held the name?
AN OLDER NAME UNDER THE NEW ONE
Purina’s own history records the genuine historical name Tidy Cat. Singular packaging therefore exists in the brand’s history. The unresolved part of this report is the particular modern checking interval and package, not a claim that Cat never appeared. Keep that distinction with any photograph you find.
Keep your first version
Record the detail before opening a reference. Keep the exact object, release or edition with your comparison. A first recollection and a later discovery can be followed as separate traces.
FOLLOW THE SOURCES
Published recollection or reference; preserve the distinction between a reported sequence and an original artifact.
Published recollection or reference; preserve the distinction between a reported sequence and an original artifact.